Rohini Chandrashekar PT, MS,CCS
A 25 year old female was referred for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) following an acute myocardial infarction. Her ejection fraction (LVEF) was at 20% on 2D echocardiography. She had a history of Type 1 diabetes. 3 weeks prior to the referral she had experienced severe chest pain intermittently for a week.
She finally visited her doctor and was admitted to the ICU. An emergent cardiac catheterization was performed and she was put on an Impella device to enhance her cardiac function. Upon discharge from the hospital, she was placed on a Life Vest and told that her physical and functional capacities would need to be very limited. It was suggested that she may have to live her life in a wheelchair. Her mother investigated and then requested that she be referred to cardiac rehab.
Prior to the event she was very active with biking and running. She was enrolled in a college program and was working part time at a day care. She could not continue with these due to the event. She had been very active socially. During the initial sessions she appeared withdrawn and the Health Related QOL
outcome measure scores were poor. She began to report feeling depressed and isolated and being ready to "give up”. She was not allowed to drive. She fatigued very easily after minimal exertion and was walking half to one mile at a pace that to her was "very slow”. Her parents were extremely supportive and encouraging. At the time of evaluation her medical prognosis and expectations of recovery were poor. She was considered for but was not approved for cardiac transplantation. She expected that she would receive an automated internal cardiac defibrillator (AICD) after a couple of months on the Life Vest.
This case study illustrates how the use of the AlterG allowed the patient to achieve her goal of jogging earlier than it would have been possible with the conventional methods of rehabilitation. Reducing the body weight during rehabilitation allowed for early progression to higher intensities while maintaining the parameters required for her hemodynamic stability and safety.
- Improved 6 minute walk distance
- Decreased submaximal HR and BP responses
- Increased maximum WL on aerobic and resistive equipment
- Improved score on Duke Activity index
- Improved score on the Dartmouth QOL survey
- Independent with Home Exercise Program
- Return to school, driving and part time work
PATIENT GOALS FOR THE LONG TERM:
- Regular gym workout for > one hour
- Live life without "fear"
History / Progression
The patient was evaluated for the CR program on 10/1/14. 6 minute walk test was 1040 feet with a peak HR of 98 and a MET level approximated at 2.5. However, her exercise sessions began on 10/23/14 as she was unwell with fatigue and fever for 2 weeks. She reported being "scared”. She wore a Life Vest during her exercise routine. Frequent rest periods were required. She was monitored continuously on telemetry.
Her HR, BP, SpO2% were monitored pre exercise, after each exercise and after recovery. She tolerated a total of 18 minutes of exercise with multiple rest periods. Her blood sugars were monitored pre and post exercise. Although her progression was limited by episodes of hypoglycemia and fatigue, by 12/1/14 she was tolerating exercise for 45 minutes with 2 brief rests with minimal complaints of fatigue. Resistive exercises were added to the routine on her 6th session.
On 12/1/14 a repeat echocardiogram showed an EF of 25 to 29% with a recommendation to remain on the Life Vest till she had an automated internal cardiac defibrillator (AICD) inserted. She continued with rehab and on 12/30/14 she was instructed to remove her Life Vest as her EF was 40-45%. Her 6 minute walk was 1170 feet with a peak HR of 93 and an approximated MET level of 2.7 METS. She had completed 26 sessions out of the 36 prescribed sessions in Phase II cardiac rehabilitation. Due to insurance changes she could not continue in this phase and was transitioned to Phase III. This phase of CR included close monitoring of vitals, supervised exercise progression and education, but did not use telemetry. Although she had made gains in functional activities, exercise endurance and quality of life outcomes, these were still at a low level for her personal goals. She wished to begin training toward jogging and a gym workout.
Given the moderate increase in her EF and her determination but at the same time keeping her cardiac history and diabetic status in mind, the AlterG treadmill was added to her training routine. The reduction in body weight with the use of the AlterG, it was thought, would decrease the physiologic demand on the cardiovascular system allowing a safe progression toward her goals.
Her workload on the AlterG was decided after a walk/jog test on the regular treadmill while she was on telemetry. Her peak HR was 134 with complaint of dyspnea. The same test was repeated on the AlterG with the body weight (BW) decreased to 50% and her peak HR was 120 bpm. This was about 30 beats greater than her resting heart rate and was chosen as the optimal target rate for training. She did not complain of
dyspnea but did complain of soreness in the quadriceps muscle in both legs. She received 26 sessions of training on the AlterG in conjunction with an exercise routine on the upper body ergometer (UBE) and resistive equipment.
Download table for further details